Stop hiring on gut feel — give every interviewer the same scoring sheet and turn 5 messy opinions into one comparable record.
A structured interview evaluation form that scores candidates on skills, experience, communication and culture fit using consistent criteria. Hiring managers send the link to every panel member, collect ratings side by side, and make decisions from data instead of memory.
16 fields — customize any field or add new ones with AI.
Need different fields?
Tell the AI what to change — "add a budget dropdown" or "remove phone number" — and it edits the form instantly. Every field type above can be added, removed, or relabeled through the chat interface.
Everything you need to launch this form in minutes, share it with your team, and collect submissions reliably.
Five fixed rating dimensions mean the engineering lead and the people manager judge the same things — so their scores are actually comparable when you compare them.
1–5 ratings give you a score to sort by; free-text fields capture the nuance that ratings flatten. Reviewers do both in the same session, while the interview is still fresh.
A dropdown for interview round (screen, technical, onsite, final) lets you filter responses by stage and see how a candidate progressed through the loop.
Attach a take-home submission, whiteboard photo, or pair-programming notes directly to the scorecard so context lives with the rating, not in a separate folder.
A signature field timestamps the evaluation and ties it to the interviewer. Useful for compliance, useful for retrospectives, useful when a hire goes sideways.
Interviewers can fill it out from a phone between meetings — no laptop required, no waiting until end-of-day when memories blur.
Click "Use this template free." Flexform loads the form instantly — no account needed to preview.
Type what you want to change in the chat: fields to add or remove, rename labels, change field types, or rearrange pages.
Link to Slack or Google Sheets with one click, then embed on your site or share the link.
A 4-person technical panel each fills out the form after their session. By the time the debrief meeting starts, the recruiter has all scores in a sheet sorted by candidate, and the conversation jumps straight to where opinions diverged.
Score for prospecting skill, discovery questioning, objection handling, and quota track record. Use the dropdown to filter by interview round so you can see how a rep moves from screen to roleplay to final.
Universities and startup programs use it to evaluate cohorts where dozens of candidates go through the same loop. Ratings across the cohort are comparable because everyone scored on the same dimensions.
Agencies submit their candidates with a completed evaluation attached so the client sees the same signal the recruiter saw. Cuts down on "tell me more about this candidate" emails.
When an internal employee interviews for a different team, the form gives the receiving manager a structured read without depending on hallway conversations or the current manager's framing.
Six months in, people ops can pull every scorecard for a role family and check whether scoring patterns differ by interviewer or by candidate demographic. Hard to do that without a structured form.
Connect this form to your existing tools with no middleware. Every submission triggers your workflow automatically.
Data appears in your CRM or spreadsheet within 1–2 seconds of submission — no cron jobs, no delays.
Route submissions to different Slack channels, HubSpot pipelines, or Airtable bases based on field values.
Pre-fill form fields with CRM data for returning visitors. Update existing records instead of creating duplicates.
Yes. Open the form in the editor and type "change ratings to 1–10" or "use Strong No / No / Yes / Strong Yes" in the AI prompt. The form rewrites itself in a second or two, and you can keep iterating until the rubric matches your loop.
No accounts required. You share a single link with your panel and each interviewer opens it, fills out their evaluation, and submits. Responses land in your dashboard tied to whoever filled in the interviewer-name field.
Yes — the Slack integration posts a summary to a channel of your choice every time a scorecard is submitted. Most hiring teams point it at a private #hiring-debrief channel so the recruiter sees scores in real time.
It does. Interviewers often fill it out from a phone between back-to-back sessions, which is when memory is freshest. Layout, ratings, and signature all adapt to small screens.
Connect Google Sheets and every submission writes a row automatically. You can filter by candidate name or position to pull every interviewer's scorecard into one view, then sort, average, or chart from there.
The file-upload field handles that. Interviewers can attach the candidate's submission, a photo of a whiteboard, or notes — anything up to standard file-size limits — directly to the scorecard.
Yes. There's a Kotlin Multiplatform SDK for Android and iOS apps if you have a native internal tool, plus a standard embed snippet for web. Both behave the same as the hosted link.
For most small and mid-sized teams, yes. The free forever plan covers the template, the share link, AI edits, and the core integrations. Larger orgs running hundreds of interviews a month tend to upgrade for higher response limits and team workspaces.
Open the template, customize with AI, connect your tools, and publish — in under 5 minutes.
No signup required · Free forever plan